I believe that many students will be curious. After completing a thesis and completing the defense, if the teacher says that the thesis needs to be revised, it is very troublesome for graduates who have finally completed the thesis and can take a good rest. Many students don’t want to revise and just want to be higher. Is this okay? Does the paper still need to be revised? In this issue, the editor will share with you the knowledge related to the revision of the thesis after the defense.

need.

Modification process after defense:

1. After the formal defense, the degree applicant shall revise according to the opinions and suggestions put forward by the defense committee members, and fill in the "Feedback Form for Post-Defense Modification of the Dissertation of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law" (hereinafter referred to as the "Feedback Form", see the attachment for details), The "Feedback Form" will be submitted to the supervisor and the supervisor team for review along with the final draft of the dissertation.

2. The supervisor and the supervisor team leader will give clear opinions on the revision of the dissertation, which will be submitted to the Academic Degree Evaluation Sub-Committee for deliberation after being reviewed and approved.

3. The Degree Evaluation Sub-Committee will review the original dissertation and the "Feedback Form" and give an opinion on whether to modify it according to the opinions of experts to meet the requirements for applying for a degree. Those who meet the requirements for conferring degrees shall be submitted to the Academic Degree Evaluation Committee of the university for deliberation; if they are not revised according to the opinions, a resolution to revise and re-defense within a time limit shall be made.

4. The "Feedback Form" is archived by each training unit. The archive period is three years after the degree is awarded. The Office of the School Degree Evaluation Committee will conduct random random inspections from time to time.

Graduation thesis defense is an important form of organized, prepared, planned, and authenticated relatively formal review of the thesis.

The main purpose is to further review the thesis, that is, to further examine and verify the author's knowledge of the topics discussed in the thesis and the ability to demonstrate the topic on the spot: to further examine the depth and breadth of the author's professional knowledge; Complete it independently.

Whether it is self-reporting, or answering questions, we must pay attention to grasp the proportions. Emphasize the key points and outline the minor points; where the research is in-depth, it is better to talk more, and the places where the research is not enough is better to avoid not talking or talking less.

The answering time of the respondent is generally limited to a certain period of time. Unless the respondent teacher particularly emphasizes the requirement to expand the discussion, it is not necessary to expand it in detail. Answer the main content and central idea directly, remove the side details, be simple and straightforward, and get to the point.

Today's editor's sharing is here. If you have any doubts or want to know more related content, you can pay more attention to the updated content of our website.